Daddy Slam kirjoitti: Su Elo 30, 2020 7:12 pm
Meitsi70 tarkoitettu...
Tässä noista sun parhaista todisteista. Et tiedäkään kuinka paljon sulle on naurettu tänään! Oot kyl HUIKEE kaveri! Hae töihin johonkin tutkimusryhmään, sun kykyjä varmaan tarvittais ympäri maailman. Ei helvetti, et voi olla todellinen kaveri!?
Selväähän kaikille on myös se, että et tiedä sitä sekvenssiä, mitä PCR-huumoritesti " etsii "?
" The accuracy of test results:
The viral test for COVID-19 is accurate when taken in ideal conditions.A recent laboratory study found that different COVID-19 testing kits correctly detected COVID-19 in samples more than 95% (and frequently 100%) of the time. When tests were done on samples without the virus, the tests correctly gave a negative result 96% of the time.
But it is important to remember that tests don’t work as well in the real world. No viral test is 100% accurate. In real-world use, the viral test for COVID-19 is not 100% ‘sensitive’ (meaning able to correctly identify people with the disease all of the time). This means that if 100 people who have the disease are tested – some will have a negative result (i.e. a false negative result).
Reasons for a false negative test result could be because:
• the sample was taken at the wrong time (too early or too late)
• the swab did not pick up any pieces of the virus, or
• the sample of mucus (or liquid from the lungs) wasn’t big enough.
This means that it is very important to isolate yourself if a health professional asks you to, even if your test result is negative. The viral test for COVID-19 is much better at correctly identifying people who don’t have COVID-19 (this is known as a higher ‘specificity’). We expect very few (if any) false positive test results (a false positive being a positive test result for someone who does not have the disease). "
What the test results can and cannot tell us.
Even when we take the uncertainties of testing into account, the results can tell us a few things. A positive test tells us that a person either has COVID-19 (whether they have symptoms, or not) or has had COVID-19 recently. We may not be able to distinguish whether the person is currently infectious or not so we will take a precautionary approach.
A positive test cannot tell us:
• if the person is currently infectious
• how ill the person is likely to become.
A negative test can tell us the person was unlikely to be infectious at the time of the test.
A negative test cannot tell us:
• if the person was exposed to the virus or not
• if they are in the early stages of incubating the disease
• if they caught COVID-19 in the past
• if they were infectious in the past
• that they will not get COVID-19 in the future.
Note: if a person has a negative test result and they are at a higher risk of having COVID-19, they may be tested again.
How to tell if someone is infectious:
Healthcare workers can work out whether a person is - or was - infectious from a positive test for COVID 19 combined with:
• any virus detected in the test
• the person’s symptoms (more severe symptoms mean that a person is more likely to be infectious) and when their symptoms started, particularly coughing, and
• whether people they had contact with became ill with COVID-19 later.
It is not possible to say exactly how long someone will be infectious when they have COVID-19. Studies so far show that many people could be infectious for seven days after symptoms start, and some severely-affected people may be infectious for longer. This is still under investigation because this is such a new disease. It all depends on how severely they are infected and how their body's immune system responds (see next section). Sometimes people may have the virus without any symptoms (asymptomatic cases); these people may also be infectious. Some people may test positive for COVID-19 for some time after they have recovered and no longer have symptoms, but they are unlikely to be infectious beyond 72 hours after their symptoms have ended. "
Ps. Pääset uutubeen, niin vitsikäs olet.
Olet täydellisesti munannut itsesi, etkä edes tajua. Häpeän olla suomalainen.
PSS. Sun helvetin vanhoissa, varmoissa todisteissa liitteet ei toimi, en ole yllättynyt. Muutenkin linkkisi olivat täys vitsi, niinku sinäkin.
Arvaa mikä ja mistä tämä on:
CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT = geneettinen sekvenssi
Media pääsääntöisesti on nämä yrittänyt sivuuttaa salaliittoteorioina.
huvikseenko niitä valmistetaan sairaalakäyttöön? 