ÖÖ, elikkä yrität nyt esittää että vasta-ainesuojaa ei ole käytetty taudin määrittelemiseen tähän mennessä ,niinkö ?OnyxPhoenix kirjoitti:
Tässähän se sanotaan mustalla ja valkoisella. Miten jotkut mielisairaat pirinpoltelijat saavat tästäkin jonkun "kohun" omissa porukoissaan aikaiseksi. Hohhoijaa.
Mitäs se FDA nyt sitten totesi?Siksihän rokotteet otettiin käyttöön kun huomattiin ettei pitävää vastaainesuojaa kehity tarpeeksi, mutta kuitenkin vähän että se testeissä ilmensi tartuntaa jne.
In other words, the FDA is saying, “Look, the vaccine creates specific antibodies against the spike protein, not the virus. If you take the standard antibody test after vaccination, it’ll be useless, because the test isn’t meant to detect antibodies against the spike protein. It only detects antibodies against the virus.” [3]
This raises several serious questions. One of them is: Since developing antibody tests is as easy as pie, why hasn’t the FDA developed one that detects antibodies against the spike protein?
And the answer to that question is obvious. If the FDA did develop such a test, then—in terms of conventional vaccine theory—it would be easy to see how well the vaccine is working, or not working.
It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a ... protection“The FDA is reminding the public of the limitations of COVID-19 antibody, or serology, testing and providing additional recommendations about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.
Antibody tests can play an important role in identifying individuals who may have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and may have developed an adaptive immune response. However, antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and especially after a person has received a COVID-19 vaccination.
The FDA will continue to monitor the use of authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for purposes other than identifying people with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 from a recent or prior infection.”
Katos kun pelottelijat taas liikkeellä, vallanhimo kun on niin kivaa. Onhan sitä jo yli puolitoista vuotta jankutettu.Yle: THL:n Mika Salminen väläyttää ravintolarajoitusten nopeaa kiristymistä – ”Baareilla on tässä ikävä kyllä aika selvä rooli”
Johan tuo pointti edellisellä sivulla tavattiin.damfin kirjoitti: To Heinä 08, 2021 9:34 am Avataan nyt vielä tuota FDA:n julkaisemaa tiedotetta...https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a ... protection“The FDA is reminding the public of the limitations of COVID-19 antibody, or serology, testing and providing additional recommendations about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.
Antibody tests can play an important role in identifying individuals who may have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and may have developed an adaptive immune response. However, antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and especially after a person has received a COVID-19 vaccination.
The FDA will continue to monitor the use of authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for purposes other than identifying people with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 from a recent or prior infection.”
Eli FDA tuossa tiedottaa että vasta-ainetestit eivät sovi tilastoimaan sitä kuinka moni on saanut rokotteilla immuniteetin, vaan vasta-ainetestit soveltuvat kertomaan sen onko henkilö saanut koronatartunnan jossain vaiheessa.
Sitä en kyllä osaa sanoa miksi meidän rokotemyönteisten pitäisi olla jotenkin kiinnostuneita tuosta uutisesta, rokotteiden tehoon siinä ei oteta mitään kantaa.
In other words, the FDA is saying, “Look, the vaccine creates specific antibodies against the spike protein, not the virus. If you take the standard antibody test after vaccination, it’ll be useless, because the test isn’t meant to detect antibodies against the spike protein. It only detects antibodies against the virus.” [3]
This raises several serious questions. One of them is: Since developing antibody tests is as easy as pie, why hasn’t the FDA developed one that detects antibodies against the spike protein?
And the answer to that question is obvious. If the FDA did develop such a test, then—in terms of conventional vaccine theory—it would be easy to see how well the vaccine is working, or not working.
