URSA kirjoitti: Ke Syys 07, 2022 12:04 pm
^^^^Väitätkö ettei ydinaseita ole oikeasti käytetty koskaan edes Japanissa?
Jälleen kerran, en minä ole väittämässä yhtään mitään, mutta en voi sille mitään että on herännyt epäilyjä sen suhteen pommitettiinko palopommeilla vai atomipommilleilla, sillä tuhoissa ei juuri ole eroa esim Dresdeniin, joka myös lähetettiin kivikaudelle tiputtamalla niskaan palopommeja. Ihmetellään kuinka betonirakenteet voivat olla ehjiä ja jälki muutonkin samanlaista kuin muissa Japanin kaupungeissa joihin ei ollut tiputettu "atomipommeja".
U.S. Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who in 1945 inspected the bombed-towns of Japan, testified:
In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.
It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.
I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.
At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.
What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.
The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.
Linkin takaa löytyy harvinaisia kuvia tuhoista ja koko juttu muutoinkin.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/hiroshim ... not-nuked/
Vuonna 1990 julkaistu 40 vuotta kestänyt tutkimus osoittaa, ettei pommituksen uhreilla esintynyt esim geneettisiä muutoksia ja mutaatioita, joita olisi luullut syntyvän johtuen radioaktiivisesta säteilystä.
THE NEW YORK TIMES KIRJOITTAA:
A 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki shows radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations, a researcher said today.
The researcher, John Boice of the National Cancer Institute said, ''Ionizing radiation is known to cause heritable mutations in many species of plants and animals, but intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congenital abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes.''
Juttu jatkuu:
https://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/01/us/h ... amage.html
salaliittoteorian takia mutta muistelen, että tositoimessa käytetyt ydinaseet aiheuttivat erilaista tuhoa kuin testeissä yksinkertaisesti siitä syystä, että ydinasetesteissä ydinaseet laukaistiin maanpinnan tasalla kun sodassa ne pudotettiin lentokoneista ja laukaistiin ilmassa kaupunkien yläpuolella.